Apple has revealed a few days ago that the iPhone has voluntarily slowed down with older batteries to avoid unexpected failures. IPhone owners have responded quickly and have filed at least eight class actions against the company since then.
One of these class action lawsuits claims Apple’s losses of nearly $ 1 billion. It sounds like a joke, but Apple did that in itself. With the quiet deceleration of iPhones, Apple has fueled a conspiracy theory that old iPhones are intentionally slow, allowing buyers to buy new models. Allegedly, Apple found the $ 999 billion lawsuit against Apple. The lawsuit from Violetta Mailyan, California, states that “each member of the class had to buy a new iPhone model because the performance of their previous iPhone model had slowed down” to the defendant’s stated conduct. ”
The lawsuit also alleges that Apple may have revealed that iPhones have been slowed down and that class members may have purchased new batteries instead of replacing their devices.
However, Apple has just given a confirmation of what happens after a Reddit user finds out that replacing the battery will restore the phone’s performance.
These $ 999 billion can be wild, but Apple will have to defend itself in court. And that is not the only case. Reuters says there are at least eight lawsuits filed against Apple in California, New York and Illinois. There is even a lawsuit against Apple in Israel.
One of the cases, advocated by lawyer Jeffrey Fazio, the same lawyer who won a $ 53 million contract with Apple in 2013 for iPhone warranty claims, says Apple has decided to conceal the battery’s mistake. The lawsuit claims that “the inability of the batteries to cope with the demand generated by the processor accelerates” without the software update slowing down the iPhone being a mistake.
“Instead of repairing the battery error by offering a free battery replacement for all the iPhones involved, Apple has tried to disguise the battery bug,” the lawsuit says.
Apple might have more important effects from the conspiracy theory mentioned above: Apple is slowing down older iPhones, so buyers are buying new ones.
“If it turns out that consumers have replaced their battery instead of buying new iPhones, if they knew the true nature of Apple’s updates, you could start to have a better case for some kind of Apple misstate or fraud “Boston Rory Van Loo, who specializes in the consumer technology right, said Reuters.
Others do not believe that Apple did something wrong. Chris Hoofnagle, faculty chief at the Berkeley Law and Technology Center, told Reuters that “we have not yet reached consumer protection standards with outdated products.” “The ethical approach could involve compromising or even disabling the functionality of a device with a security flaw,” he said.
In addition to the compensation, as in the case of nearly one trillion US dollars, other lawsuits require a court order that prevents Apple from stopping iPhones in the future or requiring Apple to notify users.